- << previous
- 1
- 2
- next >>
But i wasnt Yugoslavia in the warsawa pact???
To all those who died in the bomb and to all my friends that were massacered the 22nd of July, I feel with you all and I give all their families my condolanses! Alt for Norge! Моя жизнь матери России!
- liank
- location: Norway
- joined: Aug 10, 2009
- posts: 171
No, it was officially neutral and unaligned, although it was a communist country.
Winter War 70 years
30 November 1939 - 13 March 1940
- SL
- location: Finland
- joined: Oct 14, 2009
- posts: 200
ok, thanks :)
To all those who died in the bomb and to all my friends that were massacered the 22nd of July, I feel with you all and I give all their families my condolanses! Alt for Norge! Моя жизнь матери России!
- liank
- location: Norway
- joined: Aug 10, 2009
- posts: 171
ok, thanks :)
To all those who died in the bomb and to all my friends that were massacered the 22nd of July, I feel with you all and I give all their families my condolanses! Alt for Norge! Моя жизнь матери России!
- liank
- location: Norway
- joined: Aug 10, 2009
- posts: 171
USSR is stronger than USA, because the soviets got many natural resourses more than USA. The soviet industry where stronger. I don't whant somebody to say: Why USA is weaker? At the moment USA is stronger than Russia, but in the past USSR where stronger.
Dum spiro spero.
The US should be stronger than the USSR, seriously. Don't say "natural resources", because the Soviet Union may have been big, but after the Volga it's mostly snow and barren plains. Historically the Soviet Union never really stood a chance when comparing industry and riches. The western world made them look big and powerful because they needed a common enemy. The Soviet Union collapsed for a reason, it couldn't keep up with the capitalists economically or militarily.
- BOB
- location: Unknown
- joined: Jun 07, 2010
- posts: 1
BOB said
The US should be stronger than the USSR, seriously. Don't say "natural resources", because the Soviet Union may have been big, but after the Volga it's mostly snow and barren plains. Historically the Soviet Union never really stood a chance when comparing industry and riches. The western world made them look big and powerful because they needed a common enemy. The Soviet Union collapsed for a reason, it couldn't keep up with the capitalists economically or militarily.
Militarily they easily kept up with the Western powers albeit creating massive financial debt. The only way to stop a tank rush in Western Europe by Russia was by a tactical nuclear strike according to America. So without nuclear weapons the USSR was a more powerful military force and even with nuclear weapons in the equation the Soviets had more. The USSR also had the worlds largest mineral and energy supplies and Russia still does to this day.
Their economy was terrible though and led to their downfall with the huge military spending a major reason.
I tore a path screaming through wind and blood, I will it all, burning deep, in my, skull
The only reason USSR were considered to have the back foot n the nuclear arms race was because they did not have anywhere from which to launch short-range older missiles, which mad up the majority of both US and USSR arsenals, this all lead to the cuban missile crisis of course.
In order to know how to use free will, we must first know how to fight for it.
pretty good mod! keep making more.
If I could conquer the world what would I do? Oh first my capital would be Constatinople. Then everybody gets tacos and gets Making History shirts :D!
- napoleon217
- MHII
- location: United States
- joined: Nov 02, 2009
- posts: 67
On the topic of NATO's first attack, let's not forgot that the United States had more wars than the USSR during the cold war, and the Warsaw pact had almost NO AGGRESSION AT ALL. The only state from the Warsaw pact which led military operations was the Soviet Union, and they did it even against allies (the 1968 assault of Czechoslovakia for example). In consequence, both the superpowers showed the world imperialist tendencies at that time, while their allies were quite and peaceful, and I don`t consider NATO's attack an issue...
- Vict0r1984
- location: Romania
- joined: Jun 11, 2010
- posts: 19
Vict0r1984 said
On the topic of NATO's first attack, let's not forgot that the United States had more wars than the USSR during the cold war, and the Warsaw pact had almost NO AGGRESSION AT ALL. The only state from the Warsaw pact which led military operations was the Soviet Union, and they did it even against allies (the 1968 assault of Czechoslovakia for example). In consequence, both the superpowers showed the world imperialist tendencies at that time, while their allies were quite and peaceful, and I don`t consider NATO's attack an issue...
I wouldn't call the eastern bloc allies, you're being to generous to them xD They were more like puppets :P
I tore a path screaming through wind and blood, I will it all, burning deep, in my, skull
- << previous
- 1
- 2
- next >>
